The summary was silent on planetary science, but a draft of report language circulating online suggested strong concern by Senate appropriators about the status of Mars Sample Return (MSR). That included restoring a $54 million cut proposed for heliophysics in the 2024 budget request. The bill summary also noted that NASA’s Earth science, astrophysics and heliophysics divisions would be funded at or slightly above 2023 levels. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), ranking member of the CJS subcommittee. “We were able to protect the most important national priority within NASA’s budget, at least in my view, which is to return humans to the moon and maintain our strategic advantage in space,” said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), chair of the CJS appropriations subcommittee. The bill funds “the tools for NASA to return astronauts to the moon, including the first woman and person of color, and to maintain U.S. In brief comments at the markup, senators said that exploration was their highest priority. That amount, the summary stated, fully funded Orion, the Space Launch System and ground systems while providing “sufficient funding to continue progress on the Artemis Campaign Development,” including the Human Landing System awards to SpaceX and Blue Origin. That summary did not include a full breakout of funding for the agency in the bill, but it noted that NASA’s exploration programs would get $7.74 billion, less than the $7.97 billion requested for 2024 but more than the $7.47 billion those programs received in 2023. That is below the $25.384 billion the agency received in fiscal year 2023 and significantly less than the $27.185 billion the agency requested for 2024. The committee had not released the text of the bill or accompanying report as of early July 14, but a bill summary by the committee stated it provided $25.0 billion for NASA. That bill funds NASA as well as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Science Foundation, among other agencies. The Senate Appropriations Committee advanced a commerce, justice and science (CJS) spending bill for fiscal year 2024 on a 28–1 vote during a July 13 markup. GAO believes that the plan is overly optimistic, given the President's budget proposal and the Budget Enforcement Act's fiscal constraints on discretionary spending.WASHINGTON - House and Senate appropriators have drafted bills that would give NASA slightly less money in 2024 than it received in 2023, rather than the significant increase the administration requested. GAO noted that: (1) between fiscal year (FY) 1988 and FY 1991, the NASA budget has grown steadily in current dollars from $9 billion to $14 billion (2) although the NASA FY 1992 budget submission proposed the 5-Year Plan, in which its annual appropriation would reach nearly $25 billion by FY 1995 based on previous trends in increasing NASA budget authorities, the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 set limits on discretionary spending that constrained funding allocations for NASA programs (3) for FY 1992, Congress provided NASA with a 3-percent increase, and advised NASA to expect roughly a 3- to 5-percent increase for FY 1993 (4) the current NASA 5-Year Plan estimates that ongoing programs and schedules will require $90.4 billion through FY 1991, excluding one project totalling $2 billion, due to possible termination of that project and (5) for NASA to realize $92.4 billion in budget authority between FY 1993 and FY 1997, as its current plan reflects, Congress would have to increase its budget each year to an appropriation of over $21 billion by FY 1991. GAO discussed the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) 5-Year Plan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |